top of page


Operating a Vehicle While Impaired—Defenses
A charge of care or control while impaired can be challenged even if the vehicle was stationary. The presumption (being in the driver's seat) is rebuttable if the absence of intent to drive is proven. The Crown may nonetheless argue a "realistic risk of danger" based on impairment level, key position, engine status, location, and behaviour. A reliable alternative plan (taxi, walking, hotel) refutes this risk and often leads to an acquittal. A lawyer can help build this defenc

Alexandre Lacroix
Jun 260 min read


The Right to a Trial Within a Reasonable Time—Conditions for Invoking the Jordan Decision
The Jordan decision (2016) reformed the right to be tried within a reasonable time (section 11(b) of the Charter). It sets presumptive ceilings of 18 months (provincial court) and 30 months (superior court), from the laying of the information to the end of trial. Delays attributable to the defence are subtracted. Beyond the ceiling, the delay is presumed unreasonable, unless exceptional circumstances are raised by the Crown. The motion must be filed in a timely manner, before

Alexandre Lacroix
Jun 180 min read


Driving Under the Influence: The Impact on the SAAQ
An impaired driving charge triggers a complex administrative process with the SAAQ. After the arrest, the licence is suspended and the vehicle is towed. To get back the right to drive, assessments are required; a restricted licence with an ignition interlock device may be imposed. If found guilty, the sanctions extend further, especially for a high blood alcohol concentration, refusal to comply, or a repeat offence. A repeat offence can lead to a lifetime obligation to use an

Alexandre Lacroix
Jun 80 min read


Criminal Non-Liability: Understanding What the Law Recognizes—and What It Requires
This article addresses the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder under section 16 of the Criminal Code. To rely on it, the accused must show that a mental disorder prevented them from understanding the nature of their act or its moral wrongfulness. The Turcotte case illustrates the complexity of this defence when a mental disorder coexists with voluntary intoxication. The framework resulting from that verdict is also summarized.

Alexandre Lacroix
Jun 70 min read


Understanding the Effects of a Criminal Record and Its Consequences
A criminal record in Canada carries serious consequences: difficulties with employment, housing, travel, and immigration. Solutions exist to avoid one: a discharge (conditional or absolute), an acquittal, the Alternative Measures Program, a section 810 order, or a record suspension. A criminal defence lawyer is essential to choosing the best strategy for each situation.

Alexandre Lacroix
May 200 min read
bottom of page
